Drop-everything movies
What’s your “drop everything” movie?
You know the moment; you’re flipping through your channel guide, not looking for anything in particular, and you run across that film: It doesn’t matter that you’ve seen it 13 times already, nor does it matter what point in the movie it’s at: You immediately stop flipping to watch ’til the end, even if it’s 4 a.m. and you have to be up early the next morning. Recently for me it’s been Superbad. ( I’ve already caught like five different showings on Starz this month.) In past years, it’s been the rockumentary Dig! and the football tearjerker Rudy. Which movies stand up to your unlimited viewing pleasure? —Jemal Duran (“sasquatch” on the message boards)
Donna Bowman
You and I are on the same wavelength, Jemal. When faced with the task of compiling my top 10 (or 20 or 30 or 144) movies of all time, I use “drop everything” as one of my key criteria. I ask myself “If I flipped into this movie while channel-surfing—opening credits, middle, or end—would I be compelled to sit and watch the whole thing?” The movies that pass that test are likely to top my favorites list, which has the interesting effect of making my favorites list a smorgasbord of ridiculously entertaining movies like RoboCop and Singin’ In The Rain. And I’ve tested that theory any number of times; recently, while my husband and kids were out of town, I spent an unexpected afternoon watching Defending Your Life (a top-five perennial) after coming across it on one of the Encore movie channels at the point where Albert Brooks is about to meet Rip Torn for the first time. Probably the least instantly gratifying title in my personal canon is Terence Malick’s Days Of Heaven, but who in their right mind could hit the clicker after even the most fleeting glimpse of those beautiful frames? Come to think of it, maybe “arresting visual sense” is the other characteristic shared by the movies that crowd near the top of my all-time list. I can’t imagine tearing myself away from Lawrence Of Arabia’s singular palette and scale, no matter whether I happened to drop into the British army headquarters, the endless desert dunes, or the conquest of Aqaba.
Josh Modell
First of all, I should point out that director Paul Thomas Anderson answered this question for us in our new book Inventory—he inexplicably listed The Shining and The Birdcage. (This is why Anderson is awesome.) My answer, if I’m being totally honest, is that I really never do this. What I will do, however, is stop and watch about 30 minutes of a movie I’ve already seen a bunch of times, particularly if it happens to be at a point that I particularly enjoy. I’ve watched clumps of the Bourne movies probably a dozen times (since they’re always on), and the behemoth that is Con Air can often grab me for a while, as long as it’s not too close to the end. But the movie I’m most likely to sit and watch for the longest time is probably The Jerk, which makes no sense, because not only do I own it on DVD anyway, but I also probably have the whole thing memorized. Maybe someday I’ll do that one-man show I’ve been planning, called Navin R. Johnson: Sounds Like A Typical Asshole.
Tasha Robinson
TV on DVD has changed the way I structure my free time—it’s been a long time since I’ve flipped through channels instead of just popping in the next disc of whatever show I’m catching up lately—but in the past, I’ve had two of these, and they’re both weird anomalies in my usual movie-watching pattern. In college, it was New Jack City. The boyfriend and I would tune into it whenever we saw it in the cable listings, always thinking we’d just re-watch that amazing opening helicopter shot. Ninety minutes later, we’d sort of shake ourselves and say “Wait, did we just watch that whole film again?” Post-college, the same thing happened to us several times with Mel Brooks’ first comedy, The Producers. Often on Friday nights, we’d go to the boyfriends’ parents’ place, where his dad would screen 16 and 35mm movies from his vast collection for whoever showed up. Whenever people were threatening to leave after the first feature, he’d just quickly start up The Producers, knowing we’d all instantly be hypnotized by Zero Mostel’s antics. I’m not really of a fan of Mel Brooks’ other movies, or of rise-and-fall crime dramas and Wesley Snipes, so I couldn’t tell you why these two movies are so effective at snagging me. New Jack City just has such a consistent flow from one scene to the next that it’s hard to pull away, and The Producers has so many memorable high points that it’s far too easy to get roped into just waiting for the next one.
Leonard Pierce
For me, this question has only one answer. Well, technically, two: The Godfather and/or The Godfather Part II. No matter when, how, or where I encounter it, I’m down for the duration. Whether it’s a late-night TV viewing, with the accompanying heavy-handed edit, or a cable marathon, or even a rare showing of the “Saga” version that’s in chronological order, I’d be hard pressed to think of anything I’d have going that’s better than watching Coppola’s masterpiece. (The epic length of the movies works to my benefit, too, since I can usually put off any amount of important work I have to do in the time it takes to watch the six and a half hours of both combined.) Back when I lived in Chicago, friends of mine would even host Godfather-watching parties once a year—both films, punctuated by a big Italian meal between them—knowing that they were the only two movies guaranteed to hold a crowd’s attention for that long. And, best of all, once you’re done and it’s time for everyone to leave—or for you to get back to work—there’s always The Godfather Part III.
Claire Zulkey
One of these three movies is often on when I need something to watch while I put things in my food-hole, and they tend to remain on long after the food-items are gone:
- Forgetting Sarah Marshall. There’s always something new in it that tickles me, like the way the camera doesn’t cut to Mila Kunis’ character when she’s gently hectoring Peter from her table at the bar, or the way he says ”’Scuse me” when she’s trying to give him a pep talk. Plus, there are worse ways to spend your time than gazing at gorgeous Hawaiian scenery.
- Ghostbusters. Especially if I catch it during the first half, which I think I’ve watched less than the second, so it’s “new” to me. (“New” in that I’ve only seen it 20 times, as opposed to 50.)
- Steel Magnolias. It’s the one chick flick that’s close to my heart, especially because of Dolly Parton, Shirley MacLaine, and Olympia Dukakis. You get a room of girls going, and I bet before too long, we can quote the entire film. Maybe that’s part of the reason why I like it—knowing that there are probably at least a couple of my friends out there catching it at the same time I am.
Amelie Gillette
I agree with Claire on this one. If Steel Magnolias is on, I will watch it, even though I’ve seen the movie so many times, I don’t even know if it actually counts as watching anymore. It’s more like remembering along with the movie. And I don’t even really like Steel Magnolias. I don’t know how this happened to me. I blame my two sisters. And Louisiana. But I take comfort in the fact that if I am ever kidnapped and held in solitary confinement for months at a time, I will be able to stave off insanity by replaying the entirety of Steel Magnolias in my mind—including dialogue, music cues, sound effects, etc.—over and over. Of course, this will probably cause a different kind of insanity, specifically the kind where you mutter things like, “Drum loves pork ’n’ beans. Eats ’em with everything.” “That explains a lot,” under your breath, but it’s better than non-Dolly-Parton-related insanity. Probably.
Genevieve Koski
(Warning: girliest film trifecta ever incoming.)