Fair Play review: In this riveting thriller, business and pleasure don't mix
Phoebe Dynevor and Alden Ehrenreich anchor this study of a toxic relationship set in the world of finance

A lot of films that attempt to assay the traditional power imbalance of male-female relationships either make the mistake of staking their fortune to a definitive worldview, or get so bogged down in gender studies didacticism that they fail to deliver actual entertainment. The wickedly engaging Fair Play, though, lives and breathes.
The feature debut of writer-director Chloe Domont, the film is a bad-romance thriller with an ample side serving of corporate backstabbing. It also serves as a fabulous showcase for stars Phoebe Dynevor and Alden Ehrenreich. What Fair Play gets most right, though, is its headlong dive into the messy complications and charged ambiguity of navigating romance in a fast-changing world. The result is an enjoyably caustic, character-driven drama that connects on multiple levels.
Set against the backdrop of a cutthroat Manhattan hedge fund management firm, Fair Play tells the story of a young, engaged couple whose secret relationship stands in violation of their company’s non-fraternization policy. Both eagerly seeking to climb the corporate ladder, Emily (Dynevor) and Luke (Ehrenreich) work as analysts for a boss, Campbell (Eddie Marsan), who wields his steely, calculated disregard like a shock baton.
When a coveted promotion, thought to go to Luke, instead goes to Emily, it sets in motion a series of events that turn up the temperature in what is already a high-pressure environment. While Luke initially maintains a façade of supportiveness, Emily’s elevation to the role of project manager summons forth petty jealousies and latent uncertainty. Against the backdrop of shifting power dynamics within their relationship, the couple must grapple with changes in what they are willing to bear for success.
By design, Fair Play provides dynamic, emotionally rich terrain for its two leads to traverse, and they do not disappoint. Dynevor (Bridgerton) is utterly superb, giving full dimension to an arc that sees her become the lead of her own story. Ehrenreich, meanwhile, locates a subtle speech pattern that, even when his answers aren’t specifically clipped and terse, still manages to communicate swirling undercurrents of resentment. This helps create a wonderful tension that opens up the material to further assessment and debate. Does Luke, in his bruised sullenness, genuinely love Emily (can he, even?), or is his entire attraction conditionally tied to a professionally packaged subservience?
Domont’s script, as she has noted in interviews, comes from a personal place, and this lived experience assists her in astutely capturing the myriad ways a person (often but not always a woman) can contort and diminish themselves in order to better psychologically accommodate a romantic partner who is threatened by their ambition and accomplishments.